Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Does age matter if you want to publish a non fiction book?

+0
−0

Specifically, with some kind of psychological subject, and some theories and philosophies. The book will have subjects people generally refer to as from people experienced in life, who have been through a lot.

So, when someone who is say 50 years old, I assume people (and specifically publishers) would give it a fair shot and make a judgement on whats in it. This is my assumption, so please correct me if I am wrong.

But what if someone who is say 20 years old, wants to publish a book filled with "life experience" and advice you would suspect from someone older. How would publishers react to this? Would they give it a fair shot, or reject it because of the age of the author? And would they also publish it like that, or would they prefer a 'older' pseudonym?

So to summarize my question: Do publishers select manuscripts based on age? And if yes, how, why and with what criteria?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/26675. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

For non-fiction, publishers basically want two things. They want you to prove that you are qualified to write the book, and they want you to have a platform -- a bunch of people who already follow you or know about you would would be likely to buy the book and recommend it to others.

I have never heard of a publisher rejecting an author based on age alone, and in today's youth-obsessed culture it does not seem likely. Age discrimination today is mostly directed to the old by the young, rather than the other way round.

However, a young person may have more trouble demonstrating that they are qualified to write a book, simply because they may not be as qualified. There is an obvious benefit in a book about life experience to have had more life experience. On the other hand, if Taylor Swift pitches a publisher a book about life experience they are going to take it because Taylor Swift has a platform.

Mere age does not qualify anybody to write about psychology or philosophy. A publisher will be looking for actual credentials -- education and/or practical work experience. But a platform trumps everything. If you can build a huge audience blogging about your ideas on psychology and philosophy, even if they are completely half baked, someone will publish your book.

Basically, publishers are asking two questions (like most other businesses): Will it sell? And will it damage my brand? If they think it will sell and not damage their brand, they will sell it.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »