Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

How to determine relative success of different, similar books published by different means?

+2
−0

This answer discusses how to choose between traditional print publishing, ebook publishing, self publishing, etc., and concludes by stating that

You should publish your book using the channel where books like yours are typically most successful.

That's certainly sensible advice, and probably quite apt if one's aim is to reach the widest audience possible for a given book, which would likely be why one publishes in the first place. (Things like money, fame, movie rights contracts and so on, are then guaranteed to follow... or not.)

But how to determine typical relative success rates among different types of publishing?

Sure, one can browse the catalogs of various online bookstores, looking for "books like [one's own]" and trying to compare rankings, but sales rankings are affected by much more than the kind of book and how it's published; for example, is the author well-known with an established fan base, or a newcomer that no one has heard of; how much marketing is being done for the author's works in general, and that specific book in particular; what price point is each book offered at; and so on. It's also a very labor-intensive process.

Short of talking to a publisher who has access to more detailed data of at least a subset of the market (and who will, of course, want to steer the author toward contracting with them if in their opinion the book is good, and not waste their time on it if it's not), is there a more expedient way? The larger a group of authors who would have access to the means suggested, the better.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+1
−0

A big part of the marketing advantage that publishers have is that they have access to this kind of information. This is a problem even for authors going the traditional route, because they are expected to provide comparable titles that have sold well as part of their query package, and it is hard to get the sales information you need to do that.

I believe there is a database on book sales that you can buy access to, but it isn't cheap.

This is one of the misconceptions about self-publishing. People are told that they have to do their own marketing. But by this people usually mean their own publicity. But the real problem with marketing is to get the data you need for decision making, and that is very hard to get when you are on the outside looking in.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »