Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Why is getting a job in journalism so difficult without a degree?

+0
−0

I've asked dozens and dozens of people similar questions, but I am interested to hear the response from SE.

At the time of the 20th century, a time with some of the greatest journalists and golden ages, the best writers were without degrees in journalism; and quite a few more were without degrees at all. I find it interesting that George Orwell would be unable to find a job at any newspaper, including local ones without much in the way of circulation. Some people, including the late Christopher Hitchens, say that it's unnecessary; but looking at jobs from journalism(dot)com, it seems to be invariably a requisite.

What is even more interesting is that some require no degree that proves your ability to write, interview, acquire sources, etc.; simply a BA in any field -- this is to say that someone with a degree in classical music is prepared to interview Iraqi freedom fighters on the front lines in Syria while having sniper bullets wizzing past their face, much like Ben Anderson of Vice, but an ex-military person who might have actually fought in M.E. wars is not.

Journalism has always been a field that is benefited from apprenticeships -- regardless of your degree in university (specifically one that pertains nothing to writing in general), nothing prepares you for overseas war-time journalism. I've read the stock arguments, e.g., about it showing some level of determination and integrity. (This, of all of the arguments, is the silliest; everyone who has been to college, or knows college students, knows that they are often times the laziest of people, and are aware of the parties, cramming, and ignoring of any discipline.)

I suppose this is far too much of a rant than it is a question, but I wanted to add some substance to the question, as the question is personal to what I'm writing. Perhaps your rebukes will be of some use. Thank you.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/29159. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

I very much doubt that there was any such thing as a degree in journalism in George Orwell's time. There has been a huge proliferation of degrees over the last half century or so, responding, I guess, to the demand of the upwardly mobile middle class to send all their children to university. Since the world clearly did not need half the population trained in Classics, they had to invent degrees in all kind of fields, including communications fields such as Journalism, Marketing, Technical Communication, PR.

These have not always caught on with industry to the same extent. You have never needed a tech comm degree to get a job as a technical writer, for instance -- perhaps because technical expertise is highly prised when hiring tech writers and most tech comm graduates don't have any.

Why does industry buy into what is essentially a marketing scheme perpetrated by the universities to make their degrees necessary to professions where no such degrees were necessary before?

  • Possibly because they are actually teaching something useful.

  • Possibly because the degree program constitutes a kind of apprenticeship, so that the candidate comes to their first job with some basic experience, which means the cost of bringing them up to speed is less and they are productive sooner.

  • Possibly because hiring is one of the scariest things you do in business and people are terrified of getting it wrong. Thus so many hiring managers make the safe choice rather than the bold choice, and hiring a degree feels like the safer choice.

  • Possibly because the system becomes self perpetuating. As soon as a person with a degree works their way into a managerial position, they are going to hire people with degrees because they believe that their own degree makes them a better worker. To hire a non-degreed person would be to say that a degree is not essential and that would devalue your own degree.

What we can see in journalism is that there are opportunities for articulate people who are experts in other fields to work their way into the field as commentators and experts to explain technical subjects when they impact the news of the day. I am pretty sure Sanjay Gupta never went to journalism school.

Insofar as the apprenticeship factor makes a difference, there may be ways to work your way into the profession through small community newspapers or filing reports on spec on offbeat stories, but it will be largely thankless and almost entirely unpaid work.

And let us not forget that journalism is a shrinking profession, thanks to the web. There are trained experienced journalists who can't find work and are looking to transition to other professions. Not the ideal market for an uncredentialed beginner to try to break in.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »