Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Comments on Shall we showcase some of our fiction, poetry, and other work?

Parent

Shall we showcase some of our fiction, poetry, and other work?

+3
−0

You might have noticed the new "categories" feature on this site. I mean this:

screenshot of categories tabs

What are categories? Categories are types of content -- main Q&A and Meta are the two that all sites share, but the feature allows sites to build other things too -- blogs, question sandboxes, wikis... and even material for critique or just to share. Meta Codidact has a category for site suggestions, for example.

Over on our site on SE, people sometimes posted short stories, excerpts from longer works, and poetry on meta or in chat (sometimes in response to contests or challenges). Neither of those was ideal, but those were the tools we had. I propose that we create a "members' work" category here, where we can post work we'd like to share. If we revive contests, we can tie that in too -- contests entries can be posted in the fiction category and linked from the contest, same as if you were going to post your entry on your personal blog or as a Google doc or whatever.

Two questions:

  1. "Members' work" seems a little clunky as a name. I was originally thinking of "fiction" but that would exclude poetry. Of course it also excludes technical writing, journalism, and other types of writing, but fiction and poetry are the kinds of work people actually posted on the old site. What should we call this category? "Gallery", maybe?

  2. The general license on this site is CC-BY-SA, but authors might want to impose a more-restrictive license for creative works (as opposed to Q&A). We can specify a tighter license for this category if we want. What license would people want to see? It must, of course, permit this site to publish the work. I'm not an expert on licenses. Regardless of license you of course retain the copyright to your work; licenses are about who else can use it and how, not about ownership.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+0
−2

For what purpose would people publish their work here?

If it is for critique, this seems like too public a forum for it. It will look like publication and that will make the work ineligible for publication elsewhere, at least until it is taken down. And if it is taken down, what happens to the comments on it and and reputation gained from the comments?

If it is a form of publication, then this seems like too unregulated a place for it. If there are no gatekeepers, then it would be useless as a publishing credit, while, again, making the work ineligible for publication elswhere.

If is is for vanity, then that seems at odds with the "professional" part of the charter of the group.

Given this, I am not sure I understand the objective.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (1 comment)
General comments
Monica Cellio‭ wrote over 4 years ago

On SE we sometimes had challenges and prompts, for the purpose of engaging the community more and perhaps trying forms we wouldn't otherwise have used. We used meta for this, which wasn't great. The works weren't things we were going to submit elsewhere. Since there was a suggestion to bring back challenges here, I thought this would be better than meta Q&A while also allowing people to share things if they want to even outside a contest, in the same way some sites have blogs.