Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Comments on Shall we showcase some of our fiction, poetry, and other work?

Parent

Shall we showcase some of our fiction, poetry, and other work?

+3
−0

You might have noticed the new "categories" feature on this site. I mean this:

screenshot of categories tabs

What are categories? Categories are types of content -- main Q&A and Meta are the two that all sites share, but the feature allows sites to build other things too -- blogs, question sandboxes, wikis... and even material for critique or just to share. Meta Codidact has a category for site suggestions, for example.

Over on our site on SE, people sometimes posted short stories, excerpts from longer works, and poetry on meta or in chat (sometimes in response to contests or challenges). Neither of those was ideal, but those were the tools we had. I propose that we create a "members' work" category here, where we can post work we'd like to share. If we revive contests, we can tie that in too -- contests entries can be posted in the fiction category and linked from the contest, same as if you were going to post your entry on your personal blog or as a Google doc or whatever.

Two questions:

  1. "Members' work" seems a little clunky as a name. I was originally thinking of "fiction" but that would exclude poetry. Of course it also excludes technical writing, journalism, and other types of writing, but fiction and poetry are the kinds of work people actually posted on the old site. What should we call this category? "Gallery", maybe?

  2. The general license on this site is CC-BY-SA, but authors might want to impose a more-restrictive license for creative works (as opposed to Q&A). We can specify a tighter license for this category if we want. What license would people want to see? It must, of course, permit this site to publish the work. I'm not an expert on licenses. Regardless of license you of course retain the copyright to your work; licenses are about who else can use it and how, not about ownership.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+4
−0

Speaking of categories, what about a category for Resources. People could suggest books on writing, write reviews on them, and other resourses, and share opinions on their virtues and vices.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (3 comments)
General comments
Monica Cellio‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

That makes sense. How would you want to structure it? One Q&A per topic with answers suggesting resources, or something like articles (non-question standalone posts that don't have answers) that the community would edit, or something else? We have support for standalone post types coming soon (to support blogs). Comments would be enabled, same as Q&A.

Mark Baker‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

Maybe the standalone posts would work better. I was thinking one page per resource, rather than lists. The other thing could work to, I suppose: a request for resource recommendations followed by answers suggesting resources -- the dreaded list post. :-) But I was thinking more in terms of proactive recommendation of resources, rather than waiting for someone to ask the question -- which they would probably do in the main Q/A section anyway.

Monica Cellio‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

I agree with that: proactive posts not questions, and use tags to categorize things as applicable (e.g. tools, critique sites/groups, reference materials).