Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Comments on Strange import artifacts.

Parent

Strange import artifacts.

+3
−0

Strange import artifacts.

I was looking at this post recently imported from books.se

https://writing.codidact.com/questions/276013

It has several things as answers that are posts from writers.se.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+4
−0

This is a fun one. This is a bug, but it's also not something we can retroactively fix, so... [status-known-about], I guess?

We discovered when we ran the import for the new stuff from Ebooks that importing stuff into a category that's already in-use is... to put it succinctly... a really bad idea. It:

  • Runs over every tag in the category doing post associations, instead of just the new tags;
  • Causes problems with voting by duplicating community-user records;
  • Tries to re-associate all existing posts with other posts based on the assumption that the Stack Exchange post ID is available, which it isn't for posts that have not just been imported.

We've mostly got away with this one; the number of posts imported was small, so the damage is limited mostly to a handful of posts that have things like this, as you've noticed. It's not practical to retroactively fix, unfortunately, but the number of posts affected is fortunately small.

We've worked out a fix for this in future using invisible temporary categories, so this doesn't affect our ability to import into existing categories going forward.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (6 comments)
General comments
James Jenkins‭ wrote over 4 years ago

There are still a bunch of unrelated answers on those imports from ebooks. How do you want to handle them? I was thinking just delete the posts and import them again. But I don't know how much work that is.

ArtOfCode‭ wrote over 4 years ago

@JamesJenkins Like I said in the answer, it's not practical to retroactively fix those. They're hard to identify and harder to find the source for programmatically - since there's only a handful of affected posts, we'll leave them as they are. Y'all can of course delete the unrelated answers if you choose to, as you come across them.

James Jenkins‭ wrote over 4 years ago

I don't have delete privilege. Can you give it to me until I clean up, or would you prefer I flag them? I am fine with either choice.

ArtOfCode‭ wrote over 4 years ago

@JamesJenkins You should have delete privileges now.

James Jenkins‭ wrote over 4 years ago

I am still getting denied access to delete when trying to delete on this post https://writing.codidact.com/questions/275977

James Jenkins‭ wrote over 4 years ago

Still don't have delete powers for answers on https://writing.codidact.com/questions/275977