Comments on A Code of Conduct, dare I say it
Parent
A Code of Conduct, dare I say it
TL;DR: I've just created a Code of Conduct, and I'd like your feedback on it.
Let's see if we can make a better go of this than Stack Exchange, hey?
It's mostly based on the Community Covenant CoC, with some adaptations to make it make more sense as applied here.
Have a read through, and leave any feedback you have in an answer here. I'll make the document mod-editable, so it's not just me who can make changes to it. While the current state of the document is the sort of thing I'd recommend using, it's up to you exactly how you want it to read - the only strong recommendation I'd make is that some form of CoC is almost always necessary.
I was hoping that our code of conduct could be something closer to the "be nice" model, something like this: - Be res …
5y ago
It's too long, and it's filled with squishy prescriptions. Yes, we won't tolerate harassment. But I think it is a mista …
5y ago
Perhaps my favorite CoC would be the one currently used by the Ruby language quoted here: > This document provides co …
5y ago
I've reviewed the updated CoC, and overall it looks pretty good. I like the basic and short approach, and I like it bein …
5y ago
I love it in its current form. Short. Simple. And primarily, it deals with being nice on an individual level, n …
5y ago
> Keep it "safe-for-work" (SFW). It's fine to discuss controversial topics, but discuss them in an adult manner without …
5y ago
I just heard about this place (thanks icanfathom). Willing to give it a try. Of course, the first thing I checked on was …
5y ago
Post
Keep it "safe-for-work" (SFW). It's fine to discuss controversial topics, but discuss them in an adult manner without letting the discussion get heated. Discussing topics of sex and sexuality is likewise allowed, but explicit sexual content is not allowed as this site is open to under-18s.
I'd suggest that this rule is too strict, especially if this CoC is going to be used across a network of Q&A sites. There are several contexts in which you might want to post something that plausibly or definitely counts as "explicit sexual content", like:
- On a writing site, discussing an explicit excerpt from some erotica.
- On a biology site, discussing the biology of the penis or vagina by way of annotated images, or discussing mating behaviours of animals with accompanying video
- On a machine learning site, constructing and posting an adversarial example of a pornographic image that tricks an AI porn filter into thinking it is benign
I'm also unsure why under-18s in particular are relevant to that rule. Are you trying to match some jurisdiction's age of consent, or film rating rule's? Why?
I'd suggest something much more permissive and which doesn't mention any particular age, like:
Don't post explicit sexual content except in posts where it is directly relevant to the question being asked.
There are situations where that will be overly permissive, of course, but that seems like the right direction to err in if this will be a network-wide CoC. Presumably, individual sites will have leeway in interpretation and freedom to impose tighter rules, but won't be able to do away with rules explicitly listed in this CoC - so any explicit rules should cover only the most clearly unacceptable behaviour and leave the edge cases and nuances to be hashed out later.
0 comment threads