Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Why closed questions tend not to get reopened?

Post

Why closed questions tend not to get reopened? [closed]

+0
−3

Closed as off topic by Canina‭ on Aug 31, 2021 at 19:24

This question is not within the scope of Writing.

This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.

This post is about Q&A websites in general.

In StackExchange there is a culture of closing questions which do not reflect "the standards"; it's a culture that I as someone who uses SE since 2012 find extreme; firstly because of the vastness of this phenomenon and secondly because it causes questions to get automatically deleted.

  • Often times SE users will try their best to edit a closed question and would have make it "valid" by the sites' scope but the question would remain closed until deletion
  • I don't recall any closed question in the SE network to have ever been reopened beside some rare cases in WebMasters SE which is a very quiet website with barely any traffic compared to others there

Why closed questions tend not to get reopened?
The only explanation I know of is occupational burnout;
Maybe many humans are just not capable of dealing with such tremendous amounts of text in a dynamic way, unless the system is very ordinal, flexible and accessible.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Off topic (7 comments)
Feedback (1 comment)
Feedback
Canina‭ wrote over 3 years ago · edited over 3 years ago

Not my downvote, but I'm not sure how or whether this is a question about the process of writing; see Writing's scope for more details on the scope. Also, I have seen plenty of poor or unclear questions being closed, edited into shape, and subsequently reopened, so there clearly exist counterexamples to your claim. I have also seen plenty of questions being edited into something that's obviously off topic where it's asked; reopening those just for them to be closed again for a different reason would be a waste of effort, although some feedback can still be left for the person who asked the question as to why the question remains closed. In neither case does one need to reach for explanations such as "many humans are just not capable of dealing with such tremendous amounts of text".