Why one sentence per paragraph in these news articles?
Lately I've noticed some news articles using (usually) a single sentence per paragraph. Some examples:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-29341850 http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/asia/61477320/five-years-in-bali-jail-possible-for-nz-man.html
I was taught in school to use about 3-4, and while I'm sure there are exceptions it seems strange to me to see a single sentence per paragraph, and it sounds kind of stilted when I read it in my head.
Is there a modern change of thought on sentences-per-paragraph, or is this to achieve a certain effect?
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/12986. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
4 answers
None of the previous responses even hint to the fact of automated writing. A growing amount of news is written by an algorithm today. The original facts are data which are then put into sentences by a machine. This obviously saves a lot of money and allows for automated A/B testing of news. (If we change that sentence there what will be the impact on reading?)
It's a lot easier to put data into short paragraphs that have no connection to each other than to connect the sentences in a meaningful way.
Note: I'm not a writer or journalist, but a software engineer.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/42269. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
All news reporting and most journalistic writing, in general, is supposed to follow the guidelines of AP Style, as stated in the AP Stylebook. So, as a previous answer stated, yes, it is a stylistic choice, and it's a journalistic standard. Typically, short paragraphs in reporting make the news easier for readers to digest and the entire article easier to read in full. Check out https://www.apstylebook.com/ to read more about it.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/32347. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
Single sentence paragraphing is perfectly acceptable, it is a stylistic choice. It's common in online journalism and tabloids. It's intended use is to make reading easier. Online newspaper articles and blogs are frequently viewed on mobile phones which make webpages look very narrow when compared to a typical computer monitor. If written this way then at least one sentence is able to be read before needing to scroll down. It's also used to keep readers interested by using single sentences rather than lengthy paragraphs. See this blog article for more info.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/12987. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
There are two reasons. First, as described in this answer, news articles are written as an inverted pyramid and are designed to be cut at any paragraph break and still work. In the late stages of newspaper assembly, the editor making the decisions about what goes where and making it all fit is not going to read and decide -- he's going to lop it off at a paragraph break. So you need paragraph breaks at "steps" in content-importance, and the more a writer does this the easier the editor's job is.
Second, journalism style developed in the context of print newspapers. A typical newspaper has 4-6 columns of text on a page, each column being fairly narrow. You want to avoid the "wall of text" where a story goes for several inches without paragraph breaks, because readers facing that tend to bail. This tends to push for shorter paragraphs (by word- or sentence-count), so that the final newspaper presentation will still be usable. While the constraints are different for online news read on desktop computers, two points: (a) some people read on phones (as noted in this answer), and (b) the same story has to work for print and online because the editor doesn't want to double his work. So if the online media site has a corresponding print edition, it's going to tend to follow this constraint.
This answer is based on what I learned working on, and ultimately being editor-in-chief of, a student newspaper in college (where I did late-stage editing with an X-acto knife -- "cut" was literal). I do not have professional journalism experience.
0 comment threads