Post History
"Literary criticism" and "editing feedback" are two entirely different beasts. Litcrit is about looking at an existing text and analyzing it. You look at the author's intent, you look at symbolis...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
by
System
·
2019-12-13T12:00:26Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/14219 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T03:49:58Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/14219 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
"Literary criticism" and "editing feedback" are two entirely different beasts.
Litcrit is about looking at an existing text and analyzing it. You look at the author's intent, you look at symbolism, at context, at what the writer wanted to achieve, at how it fits into X genre canon, and so on.
Editing feedback is what you give on an _unfinished_ piece of work with the intent of giving the author tools to _change_ and _improve_ it. You may be able to use litcrit tools to frame your feedback ("The house symbolizes X, so what if Y and Z happened and what if Mary did A and B?"), but as an editor, your job is to help the writer shape the work into its final form. Literary criticism is something you do with a work which is already final and published.
Also, litcrit is generally not done with the author. You can critique something in a classroom, a book, an essay, or a blog post, but editing feedback is personal and one-on-one, deliberately done with (and _only_ with) the writer.
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2014-10-24T13:35:25Z (about 10 years ago)
Original score: 5