Real-Life Setting versus Fictional - Can They Attain the same Realism?
My assumption here is that a novel set in the current time and world seems more realistic to a reader than a novel with a fictional setting. The reader has the ability to say, "that could be true." In a fictional novel, it's understood that what is written could never happen. My assumption is that this detracts from the novel.
My question is this: Will a plot be able to convey the same amount of realism in a fictional setting as in a current time/place setting?
To be clear: I know details add realism. My question is if a real-world setting has a sense of realism that no amount of detailing can give a fictional one. No matter how well you describe a fictional setting, the reader can never think, 'that could be real.' I want to know if that will detract from the novel.
Examples:
Fictional Setting: Lord of the Rings. The setting is pure fiction, the reader knows the place never existed.
Real-Life Setting: Harry Potter. Though the reader is fairly certain magic does not exist, there is a slight doubt because it is set in the real world. It could be true - wizards could be really good at hiding.
0 answers
0 comment threads