Post History
In one of my novels, I took two "contemporary" real life people, and sent them back to the 18th century to fight the American Revolution. (Yours truly is one of them.) My current understanding of ...
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T04:01:16Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/16104 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
by
Tom Au
·
2019-12-08T04:01:16Z (almost 5 years ago)
In one of my novels, I took two "contemporary" real life people, and sent them back to the 18th century to fight the American Revolution. (Yours truly is one of them.) My current understanding of the "libel in fiction," as in the [Red Hat Club case](http://www.gainesvilletimes.com/archives/26196/) was that the true "backstory" of the main character was so accurate, believable, and convincing, as to lead people to believe that the supposedly fictitious (and "defamatory") parts (about the main character's alcoholism and promiscuity), were also true. In other words, there was no "disconnect" between fact and fiction. Does sending your characters back in time create such a "disconnect" (assuming that your characters are reasonably well disguised)? Put another way, is "18th century" a strong enough signal of fiction so that people would not reasonably believe other things you say about your character, whether or not they are true. If you're a lawyer that can answer on legal grounds, great. If not, you can still answer as a prospective juror and "finder of fact."
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2015-02-02T16:24:28Z (almost 10 years ago)
Original score: 1