How to deal with online comments to published pieces?
I mainly write for academic journals (and creative writing for my own amusement), but from time to time, I publish opinion pieces in various mainstream magazines and newspapers, for which I am modestly compensated. Recently, some of my pieces have generated a large volume of online comments, some critical, some favorable, and some seeking clarification.
What is the best strategy in this situation? Is a modern writer expected to engage in these online discussions, or as a professional, is it better to "stay above the fray"?
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/16295. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
1 answer
There's no single standard about this. Whether you engage your readers is up to you, in some cases up to your editor at the publication in question (or perhaps their policies). Barring that kind of guidance, here are the pros and cons of reading the comments and replying to them:
Joining the discussion can make you part of the community. This can create an image of you as accessible. You can reply quickly and easily, which may be a time-saver if volume is low. However, on larger sites, replying to comments can become a chore.
Refraining from joining in discussions can make you seem aloof, but it has the advantage of letting the participants discuss the issues unencumbered. You can always reply to comments at a later time in another article, if an issue is large enough.
It's also worth thinking about whether you're better at conversational writing or considered, careful writing that can be edited and cleaned up. Whether you even read the comments is up to you; there are communities where I'd suggest never even browsing them. But many communities have worthwhile things to say in the comments. You could always join the two approaches, commenting rarely when something can be easily cleared up, saving larger discussions for future articles.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads