Post History
I agree with both your points: if your first sentence stood alone, I'd omit that. But in sequence with the other two, it sounds better to leave it in. There is an actual rule in English linguisti...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
by
System
·
2019-12-13T12:00:29Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/16771 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T04:09:57Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/16771 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
I agree with both your points: if your first sentence stood alone, I'd omit _that_. But in sequence with the other two, it sounds better to leave it in. There is an actual rule in English linguistics called _that-deletion,_ which allows you to drop the word "that" before certain independent clauses if you choose to. In this case, I'd keep it.
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2015-04-09T16:38:39Z (over 9 years ago)
Original score: 4