Post History
A while ago, I would casually read and and casually write, and I was satisfied with what I achieved. But that all changed when people started suggesting that "readers are better writers" and the l...
Question
creative-writing
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T04:56:15Z (about 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/20419 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
by
Justin Alexander
·
2019-12-08T04:56:15Z (about 5 years ago)
A while ago, I would casually read and and casually write, and I was satisfied with what I achieved. But that all changed when people started suggesting that "readers are better writers" and the like. As a result, I started switching between periods of only reading for learning and not enjoying what I read, or writing only to mechanically improve my skill. Unsurprisingly, I lost enjoyment and satisfaction in both hobbies. **What is the best way to go about writing? Should I read a lot because it will help me write well? Should I write almost exclusively to get experience writing? Or should I take a different approach entirely?** Notes: I write all kinds of creative non-fiction (practically all), but my specialties are stage-plays and short serial novels. EDIT: In case people are wondering how I've changed my harmful routine, I now partially write while I read and partially read while I write. If reading is learning and writing is doing, then no matter what I'm always learning and accomplishing.
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2016-01-11T19:23:57Z (almost 9 years ago)
Original score: 2