The difference between two speech formats
I am conflicted about which one is appropriate for a story, or whether it makes a difference at all. A few years ago, god knows where, I've seen speech that was formatted like so:
—Hello. - Tom said.
and a more common form which is found in a lot of books:
"Hello," Tom said.
Does it make a difference, whatever one I use?
EDIT: I don't know how this displays since I am using my phone, but the first speech format was supposed to have a dash at the front in case it is replaced on your screen with a dot.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/20509. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
2 answers
You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.
The dash may be European formatting, but it's not standard in English-speaking countries. Some information on the dialogue dash here: Using dashes in writing dialogue
However, if your readers are in America, the U.K., or Australia (at minimum), you should stay with quote marks. Americans use double quotes for dialogue and the British use single quotes; I don't know what Australians use.
0 comment threads
About 99+% of books printed in English use quote marks for dialog, not dashes.
Why are you considering using dashes? Is there some advantage to this for your story?
Like any rules of writing, you can always break the rules if you have a good reason. But like any rules of writing, I would strongly advise you not to break the rules unless you do have a good reason. Breaking the rules just for the sake of breaking the rules -- "I won't be bound by a bunch of silly rules", "I want my writing to be daring and avant guarde", etc -- is almost always just distracting and annoying to the reader.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/20521. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads