Post History
I agree with the other posts that if there is no story, there isn't much point in described the travel. But if you want to describe it, you should. A beautiful description is a beautiful descriptio...
Answer
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T05:03:54Z (over 4 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/21093 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
by
Shevliaskovic
·
2019-12-08T05:03:54Z (over 4 years ago)
I agree with the other posts that if there is no story, there isn't much point in described the travel. _But_ if you want to describe it, you should. A beautiful description is a beautiful description. A couple short paragraphs well formed will be nice to the reader, even if that doesn't add much to the story. Haruki Murakami uses a lot of descriptions that aren't that essential to the story line, but they are so beautifully described that you don't care and it isn't a burden to read. Just keep in mind that it will have to be interesting. A description like > A tree on a hill and then another tree and some houses etc will indeed seem boring and a burden to read.
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2016-02-24T10:32:23Z (about 8 years ago)
Original score: 1