Post History
All you need to do is establish the idea of progress in magic. You need to introduce the reader to the magic system as it stands at the beginning, sure. But for this case, you also need to demonst...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/22222 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/22222 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
All you need to do is establish the idea of **progress in magic.** You need to introduce the reader to the magic system as it stands at the beginning, sure. But for this case, you _also_ need to demonstrate that magic is something that can be investigated, innovated with, used in new ways for new uses. A simple example would be: early on,make some mention of a discovery or an evolution that has _already occurred_. It can be relatively minor, but _any_ magical discovery has potential to have impact and cause conflict. That should be plenty to find a small story hook. And in that little arc, you tell us what we need to know: - That magic is not "complete"; it progresses and evolves. - That breakthroughs _have happened before_, and will presumably continue to happen. - What the pace and dynamics of "magic science" are in this setting. (Are there magic-scientists? Are there geographical pockets that have technologically advanced far beyond other areas? How disruptive have advances been?) - What does a real discovery look/feel like? - What's necessary to succeed at innovating in magic? ...and so on. The point is, a solution is to _show_ that magic-tech is fluid, evolving. Establish that, before the setting starts to calcify into something set and unquestionable, and the reader won't think "whoa, they're breaking the rules." If you _tell_ us "Listen, this setting is still _figuring out_ the rules," you should be fine.