Post History

Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/24194
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

If it interests you, this have been the subject of researches, notably by french literary theorist and semiotician **Roland Barthes** (in _Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narratives_)

Barthes divide writers in two categories :

> **Ellipsis writers :** (sorry, not sure of the exact term), such as _Flaubert_, who will write an extended first draft (or many versions of the same text or dialog) and then cut into it.

So, that's the category which write "Excessive detail and edit the unneeded parts"

> **Catalysis writers :** Like _Marcel Proust_, who will write a first draft and then add extensions to the text (Look for _Paperolles de Proust_ on Google images)

Wich correspond to filling with details afterward. Barthes tried to find the semiotic significance of both practices, and it's really interesting, if a little bit of theory don't repel you (basically it's about the ways a writer will formulate what he's trying to say)

I would just like to add that it's not about the _necessity of those details_, but about the moment you will like to add them

Sometimes you need to write many versions or an extended draft to decide which part will really serve your narration (or just because you want to follow you imagination with the _Edit Demon_ shut off), but then your text can become muddy, that's what I was used of, and that's why I tend (or try) to get closer to the second category : writing a simple first draft (of a single chapter for example) with a clear structure that will contain all the basics of my narrative unit, without additional details, like a skeleton, and then flesh it out with all what needs to be developed.

Original score: 3