Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Runbook template example?

+0
−0

I have been searching for a Runbook / Operations Guide example and can't seem to find a useful one for my company. The current runbook they handed me contains use cases and requirements, which I know shouldn't be in one; however, I can't find a good example to show to my managers and say, "This is what we should be using."

Any ideas where I can find one or any quick and dirty examples someone can give me in an answer here?

Thanks!

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/24897. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

2 answers

You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.

+0
−0

In the end, every technical document should contain whatever information the users need to get their jobs done. This takes precedence over any template or convention.

To the extent that there are standard templates for a technical document it is because it is often difficult to tell what information users need. If you can't get information on what your particular users need, you can fall back on a general template that you hope is based on experience with real users (though in many cases they are based on a bunch of people sitting in a room guessing).

A Runbook, however, is an internal document. You have direct access to the audience for your company's runbook and can directly observe the work they do. What your IT staff need in your organization may be significantly different from a standard template. You can base your runbook on what they actually need and use.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+1
−0

I don't have a good example for this either, but my suggestion is that requirements do not go into a Runbook/Operations manual, but that the use cases would make a lot of sense, as you would be tying the steps needed to complete a function to the use case that the user is trying to accomplish from a business or technical sense. The manual then becomes a set of directions tied to the problem the user is trying to solve or the business process they are trying to complete.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/24933. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »