Post History
In a magazine where an individual author's name is not published with the article, it seems obvious to me that the article can be presumed to reflect the consensus of the entire editorial team on w...
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T05:41:11Z (about 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/24978 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
by
Dvij Mankad
·
2019-12-08T05:41:11Z (about 5 years ago)
In a magazine where an individual author's name is not published with the article, it seems obvious to me that the article can be presumed to reflect the consensus of the entire editorial team on whatever has been written in the article. Now, in such a scenario, if a group of editors writes an article which is opinion based and the others strongly feel against the things written in the article then should the article make it to the publication according to standard Journalism ethics? Also, why?
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2016-10-18T22:03:16Z (about 8 years ago)
Original score: 6