How Can I Reliably Find Well Written Novels?
Let me open by saying that I wasn't entirely sure how to ask this question and stay on topic. This is my best attempt. I do believe this question will help other writers.
As an author, I want to read a lot. I don't want to read just anything though. There's some content I don't want. Beyond that, I obviously don't want to read books that are poor examples of characterization, plotting, stakes, etc. Then there's the vague 'well written' requirement.
Aside from the obvious desire to not read poorly done works, I mimic what I read to a high degree. I can control my mimicry to a certain extent, but I don't want to have bad writing in the back of my mind while I am creating my future bestsellers. (What? Optimism is good.) It should be noted that I see my mimicry as a useful ability, and not something to be gotten rid of.
This mindset on reading has given rise to the situation I now find myself in: reading the same small collection of excellently written books over and over. I feel like I need to expand my horizons without damaging my writing.
Note: Do not confuse the question. I'm not looking for writing I can mimic. I'm simply looking for examples of good writing. The main goal is simply to not have bad writing in my head while I write.
The problem: Doing this is easier said than done. I've found plenty of passionate recommendations on this site alone, but they always seem to be followed by equally passionate criticisms of the same book. I've tried searching for the novel equivalent of the iMDB, and I've found a few results, but these websites usually have only half or fewer of the books I look up. Wikipedia gives the plot and isn't really the best place for discerning the level of writing of a particular novel. For a time I watched the NYT Bestsellers List, but I quickly discovered that a lot of what I considered 'low quality' writing was on that list.
The question: What can I do? How can I locate novels that are known for being well done?
P.S. Obviously a lot depends on my definition of 'well done,' so I'm mainly looking for a breakdown of novels, without revealing the plot.
Forget looking for your list among the bookstores and libraries. They contain legions of pretty book covers, but within …
8y ago
Your problem is not merely that you want "novels which are well-done." You want writing styles you feel safe reading bec …
8y ago
Probably the best filter of all is age. Any book that is still around 50 years after is was written is probably around b …
8y ago
Reading broadly is one of the best things a writer can do, aside from writing a lot, but reading only what you consider …
8y ago
4 answers
You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.
Probably the best filter of all is age. Any book that is still around 50 years after is was written is probably around because it is well written. Recent books get liked for all sorts of reasons other than being well written. They express a popular political or social prejudice. They ride on the coattails of a current craze. Their authors was once on a TV show. Oprah liked them. All this stuff fades away with time and you are left with the stuff that remains in circulation because it is good.
There are some anomalies, of course. Kipling is the biggest one that occurs to me at the moment. He is one of the greats of English literature and an writer can learn a huge amount from reading him. But he is branded as a voice of colonialism, though anyone who bothers to read Recessional or The White Man's Burden all the way to the end should see that some nuance should be applied to that interpretation. Anyway, todays particularly harsh political filters may diminish the stature of some of the greats of the past, but even they stand out from the forgotten masses of authors of their age.
0 comment threads
Forget looking for your list among the bookstores and libraries. They contain legions of pretty book covers, but within those covers hides the full spectrum of writing qualities.
Look instead within the books you have already read. Think back across your history of reading and try to remember the times when an author brought you to tears or made you laugh. Go find those books (even if you have to buy them again) and find the sections which touched you. Then read backwards through that work until you find the point where the author's spell began.
Very rarely does a single paragraph or phrase snare a reader's soul. When we think of the phrase "well written", we tend to think of good grammar, sympathetic characters and catchy dialogue as the necessary components. They are all important to one degree or another, but the real magic of great writing is more complicated than any of that. It is a process in which the author earns the reader's trust, then uses that trust to take them on a journey which is more than just words on a page.
If you have even one book in your reading history, which has demonstrated that kind of artistry, then your list is as long as it has to be. Go back to that great novel, and study it until you learn how the magic is done. With that knowledge properly understood, you will finally have something worth mimicking.
One trick that I have found helpful is to read with a pen nearby. When an author does something right during my nightly reading time, I make note of it. After I am done for the night, I go back and scribble some notes either in the appropriate page's margin or on a separate piece of paper. Then when I am done with a book, I add it to my reading journal. I make note of its strengths and weaknesses, focusing on its style and structure more than on its story line. I also leave some blank space after those notes so that as the memory of the book matures in my mind, I can come back and add further comments. It is amazing how a lousy read sometimes sticks my memory and slowly convinces me that I actually liked and enjoyed it. Whenever that happens, I always take notes on such special magic.
Finally, even garbage/pulp, genre-slop fiction can contain note-worthy gems. If you limit your reading list to only the highest quality material, you will miss out on the many wonderful lessons which are hidden in the dregs.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/25558. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
Your problem is not merely that you want "novels which are well-done." You want writing styles you feel safe reading because you would feel happy imitating them. You are asking someone else, someone who isn't you, to curate a list of source material for your creative output.
There's no way an anonymous or aggregate online source is going to be able to accomplish that for you. You need to sit down with a human being and present a list of novels and writers you appreciated, and why you liked them. Then that person might have a chance of assembling a list for you. We here can give you all manner of criteria (sales volume, age, notoriety, usage in schools) and they will all be useless if those particular works don't fit your personal vision.
Your best bet is to try a librarian, or several librarians. You want to find a human being who is really well-read over many genres and talk to that person or people to ask them "I like X and Y and Z because of 1 and 2 and 3. What other writers and novels of that caliber or with those qualities can you suggest?"
0 comment threads
Reading broadly is one of the best things a writer can do, aside from writing a lot, but reading only what you consider good writing is somewhat limiting. Books that have issues have a lot to teach you, too. If you avoid issues you're shortchanging your education as a writer.
If you keep finding yourself writing in a pastiche of the styles you've read, perhaps the problem isn't that you need to tightly control your input but you need to become aware of why this is happening.
Understanding why you have the impulse to pay homage to writing you admire will allow you to use this talent (and it is a talent) in a way that services your own personal stylistic goals.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads