Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A Do Epic Fantasy and Sci-Fi books have inherently more descriptive language?

I agree with Standback, but his answer is not generally true. In this time and age, most readers of Fantasy and Science Fiction have seen so many Science Fiction and Fantasy movies that their mind...

posted 8y ago by System‭  ·  last activity 5y ago by System‭

Answer
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T05:51:12Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/25729
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T05:51:12Z (almost 5 years ago)
I agree with Standback, but his answer is not generally true.

In this time and age, most readers of Fantasy and Science Fiction have seen so many Science Fiction and Fantasy movies that their minds are full of images of spaceships and dragons. You can expect the average person to be just as familiar with the inside of a spaceship or the physique of a dragon, as with the Eiffel Tower. And just as you do not have to describe the Eiffel Tower in a novel but can simply refer to it by name, because of this **[common knowledge](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonsense_knowledge_(artificial_intelligence))** about Science Fiction and Fantasy worlds that your readers bring to your books, you no longer have to describe the common elements of fantastic stories, either.

You can write "dragon", just as you write "dog", and you can write "spaceship", just as you write "car". Only if you want your readers to think of a particular type of dragon, dog, spaceship, or car, do you need to go into more detail.

* * *

I have even argued multiple times before, that you should not stifle the imagination of your readers by prescribing how they should imagine the elements of your tale. Allow them to imagine your horrors in just the way they find most horrible, allow them to **project themselves** into your narrative, and you will satisfy them the most.

Keep descriptions to a bare minimum. I skip them, anyway.

#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2016-12-29T23:21:13Z (almost 8 years ago)
Original score: 4