Post History
The publisher essentially wants to know two things about you. Can you tell a good story. Can you behave professionally and deliver on your commitments. Omitting the summary obviously reflects ...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
by
System
·
2020-01-03T20:41:51Z (over 4 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/25786 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T05:51:54Z (over 4 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/25786 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
by
System
·
2019-12-08T05:51:54Z (over 4 years ago)
The publisher essentially wants to know two things about you. 1. Can you tell a good story. 2. Can you behave professionally and deliver on your commitments. Omitting the summary obviously reflects badly on the second point. Following up promptly to correct the mistake mitigates the problem as best you can. But if you resend, resend the whole package. Don't expect that they are going to dig through their whole slush pile to find your first mail to add a synopsis to it. Send them a complete correct package with a note explaining and telling them to throw your original mail away.
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2017-01-01T22:01:46Z (over 7 years ago)
Original score: 7