Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

50%
+0 −0
Q&A Would Amazon allow sex between transformed humans (animal/object) with normal humans

Amazon's content guidelines are notoriously nonspecific. Offensive Content What we deem offensive is probably about what you would expect. I assume there are multiple reasons for this: ...

posted 8y ago by Standback‭  ·  last activity 5y ago by System‭

Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-12T20:06:04Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/26142
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T05:57:21Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/26142
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision by (deleted user) · 2019-12-08T05:57:21Z (almost 5 years ago)
[Amazon's content guidelines](https://kdp.amazon.com/help?topicId=A2TOZW0SV7IR1U) are notoriously nonspecific.

> **Offensive Content**
> 
> What we deem offensive is probably about what you would expect.

I assume there are multiple reasons for this:

- Offensive material is hard to narrow down to a set of well-defined guidelines (your question demonstrates an edge case for a seemingly-simple "no bestiality" rule). 
- They probably do most/all of their removal/banning by algorithm, so they might not even have a good, human-understandable definition to give you.
- They have legal obligations and concerns, which means that being able to remove _whatever_ might cause problems can take precedence over being transparent to authors.

There have been multiple cases of Amazon suddenly "cracking down" on erotica, or changing the guidelines - the ones I recall were in [2011](http://jakonrath.blogspot.co.il/2011/01/guest-post-by-selena-kitt-part-2.html) and [2013](http://accrispin.blogspot.co.il/2013/10/thoughts-on-great-erotica-panic-of-2013.html).

So, any answer here is going to be guesswork, and might be subject to change with no warning.

All that being said:

- Fantastical creatures seem to be accepted as not treading on bestiality. There's certainly no dearth of werewolf erotica titles, and other shapeshifters as well.
- As far as I can tell (though I am no expert), Amazon is unlikely to ban you -- if they do anything, it will be to remove your book. At which point you can make modifications (e.g. remove the chapter with the swan...), and re-upload.

My own very quick skim of the internet has uncovered a [2013 guide to Amazon's content guidelines for erotica authors](http://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/B00U9UD9TA), as well as recommendations to seek and join a good erotica-writer forum, which will have the expertise you're looking for.

If you find better, fuller, answers then this, it'd be great if you came back and filled us in :)

#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2017-01-18T15:37:56Z (almost 8 years ago)
Original score: 5