Post History
There's nothing inherently wrong with chance occurrences, in my opinion. Coincidences happen frequently in real life, after all. Regardless, what happens by chance shouldn't necessarily be dict...
Answer
#3: Attribution notice added
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/26384 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
There's nothing inherently wrong with chance occurrences, in my opinion. Coincidences happen frequently in real life, after all. Regardless, what happens by chance shouldn't necessarily be dictated by chance. I believe it's the individual writer's obligation to decide how to deal with this. Some important plot elements, for example, might follow from a chain of logical consequences. This won't be some dictated by chance, but guided by a series of deductions based on prior events. As one commenter said, there should be a degree of subtlety here. But, some events might naturally be attributed to chance. Somebody might be "the chosen one" simply because this person was in the right place at the right time. There might be a reason for this - you might decide that there's no special reason for the protagonist to fulfill the obligation set forth upon him other than his presence in a specific location. If you think about plot events in this way, I believe you'll find a balance between coincidence and consequence. If you find too many things occurring by chance, it might be time to think about your story progression and analyze the story's chain of events.