Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Approaches to finding critique group for creative nonfiction

+0
−0

How does one go about finding and joining a critique group for nonfiction?

I'm writing two different non-fiction books:

  • A collection of pieces written by a relative, collected and edited by me. Some are essays, some are scientific articles reprinted from the original journals, some are memoirs, some are about history of music.
  • A combination of memoir and how-to guide for special education advocacy.

I'd like a sounding-board for these, but the typical fiction critique groups don't feel right. How do I find a critique group appropriate for my work?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

2 answers

You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.

+0
−0

I do think it is more difficult to find a critique group for non-fiction. All fiction has a common core: an interest in story. You can still usefully critique a piece that is outside of the genre's you usually read because there is still a story there, or should be. In fact, critiques from people outside of your accustomed genre are often particularly useful because they are not charmed by all of the genre trappings: they only see the story.

It is not like that for non-fiction. There is no common core. You need feedback from people who are actually interested in your field. That is much harder to find in a local critique group. It might be possible in a university town, but even then it may be hard.

I'm not sure how well anonymous critique sites fit this problem either. They may have enough people registered to find a match for your subject, but how do you know that that is who you are getting. How do you know what axe they may have to grind? The other problem is that you will only get feedback from other people who are trying to write books. For non-fiction, particularly, you want feedback from people who are readers or practitioners in the field, not necessarily writers.

I think a better way to get online feedback on non-fiction is to start a blog. That way you can open up your ideas to commentary from the whole community, not just other writers. This certainly worked for my on my last non-fiction book. The added benefit of this is that not only do you get feedback and discussion, you also build an audience for the book, which can in turn help sell the book to a publisher.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+1
−0

Scribophile. You critique other people's work and people critique yours. You can get 10 critiques in a month. The final product is very close as what you get with a professional editor.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/26689. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »