Post History
You should only attempt the style of the 17th/18th centuries if you're writing some kind of pastiche or mimicry of a book written then — for example, a Sense and Sensibility and Dragons kind of thi...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
by
System
·
2019-12-13T12:00:44Z (over 4 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/27719 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T06:22:46Z (over 4 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/27719 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
You should only attempt the style of the 17th/18th centuries if you're writing some kind of pastiche or mimicry of a book written then — for example, a _Sense and Sensibility and Dragons_ kind of thing. CE Murphy did a [reworking of _Pride and Prejudice_ and added magic to it,](http://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/1613171056) using a style similar to Austen's but without strangling herself with her own sentences. However, modern readers can find this convoluted structure and stately diction hard to follow, so I wouldn't try to replicate it precisely. Approach it, but aim for clarity. And honestly, if you do use this kind of style, be aware that it's a gimmick, and treat it accordingly. It will narrow your audience. You may find a deep niche audience (readers who love Regency romances, for example), and devoted niche readers are not to be taken lightly, but that kind of writing will not get you broad acclaim or sales.
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2017-04-25T03:31:58Z (about 7 years ago)
Original score: 0