Post History

Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/28288
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/28288
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

This is an interesting question. I'm not a big reader of series fiction, but based on the series I have read or watched on TV I can think of several patterns:

- New book, new character. Each of the chronicles of Narnia has a new central character, often with the central character from a previous book along in the mentor role. Thus Lucy and Edmund mentor Eustace in Dawn Treader and then Eustace mentors Jill in Silver Chair. 

- Ratchet up the stakes. Same character, but the stakes are higher in each book/season. Buffy took this approach and it got more and more forced as they tried to ramp it up the next season. They kept killing or deporting mentor characters (Joyce, Giles) or adding responsibilities (Dawn) to create a new step in the basic maturation plot. But by the end it was getting pretty hard to do yet another Buffy grows up arc. 

- Broken record. The same inner conflict plays our over and over again from book to book with little or no progress. The wounded detective genre of mystery fiction seems to use this a lot. Each case reveals the same woundedness in our detective over and over again. This is actually quite true to life, we do tend to keep bumping up against the same wound over and over again in our lives without making much progress. Broken record can go on indefinitely or it can end with the wound finally healed, as they did in House where House's inability to love is finally resolved as he goes off on a motorcycle tour with his dying friend -- an act of reconciliation and love. 

- Protagonist as mentor/ally. The series protagonist is not the hero of the individual stories, but takes the mentor or ally role from the classic hero's journey formula. The central character arc for each volume is the person the hero helps. Westerns, such as Lone Ranger or Bonanza seems to use this a lot. 

- More than one conflict. The same character may have more than one inner conflict to resolve. Each book tortures them in a brand new way. But I'm struggling to think of an obvious example of this. Maybe it does not work so well in a series where the reader really does want the same story over and over again. 

- Long slow arc. The series is really one long story and the arc or arcs is resolved over the entire series. Each book contains just one episode in the overall arc. LOTR is six books in three volumes but the main arc play out across the entire series. These are often billed as trilogy or whatever number -ogy depending on the number of volumes, indicating that together they make one story. 

- Family saga. The same basic story plays out over and over again from one generation to the next. 

- Tall tales. The books are essentially yarns or tall tales that rely more on whimsey than character development for their appeal. 

- News of the day. The hero does not develop much if at all, but each book stays fresh by taking on the news of the day -- the thing that has got everyone alarmed this season. Thrillers often take this approach. Lots of disarm the nukes plots in the cold war era. Lots of terrorist bomb plots today. 

- Will they/won't they: A romantic version of the broken record. Will the hero and the heroine finally get together? Sam and Diane. Tony and Ziva. Booth and Brennan. Maddy and David. When will those two crazy kids finally work it out?

There is no doubt, though, that a series has to keep pulling its punches in order to leave it somewhere to go. Thus few series are highly regarded as literature. They are most often popcorn books, relying more on invention and narrative force than serious character development for their appeal.

Original score: 2