Why do newswriters separate women when they report on disasters?
It's commonly known that the news reports female casualties separately. As in "four people were shot, including one woman". What is the reasoning behind this? Is anyone who knows about the news reporting process able to answer?
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/28296. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
2 answers
Do they really still do that? The origins are not hard to guess at. It has been a fundamental social presumption for centuries that the essential role of men is to protect women and children. On sinking ships, the rule was women and children first, and woe betide a man who survived a shipwreck in which a woman or child perished.
And of course this rule was pretty much a practical necessity at anytime up to the creation of civilian police forces. Routine protection of persons in everyday life was simply not a function of government up until quite recently, or at least no one it had the means to effectively carry out.
But do they really still do it? And if they do, is it perhaps just a cultural survival, or do we really still think that women's lives matter more?
0 comment threads
Makes an emotional and social impact
Making a point of how many women and/or children perished or were harmed in a given event makes a larger emotional and social impact. It turns the causative entity into a cruelty or an horror, be it an impersonal force such as nature or certain views on god(s), or be it a personal force such as a person, group of persons, or representational organization.
Most cultures, regardless of how advanced they see themselves, will in reality react more strongly to harm towards the female or the young of the species.
The news is in the business of selling stories. And stories with a twist or a bang sell more.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/28300. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads