Post History
Any rule can be broken, the trick is to know why the rule exists. In this case, it is difficult (and potentially frustrating) for the reader to (a) follow/understand and (b) emphasize with too many...
Answer
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T06:32:30Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/28363 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
by
Chris Sunami
·
2019-12-08T06:32:30Z (almost 5 years ago)
Any rule can be broken, the trick is to know why the rule exists. In this case, it is difficult (and potentially frustrating) for the reader to (a) follow/understand and (b) emphasize with too many different characters. It's also difficult for the writer to successfully distinguish them on the page. Remember, just because you can tell them apart, doesn't mean the reader can. All these things are as true for any story with many characters and a single viewpoint as it is for a multiple POV story, but the POV scenario adds additional challenges to successful suspension of disbelief (since it doesn't match our usual experience). If you can solve these problems, then go ahead and do it, but you're setting yourself a difficult challenge.
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2017-05-30T17:09:47Z (over 7 years ago)
Original score: 1