Recaps: Yes, No, and How To?
Recaps. We've all seen them. This question deals with whether or not they should be included in a series of novels, and if they should, how.
Many series use recaps to 'catch up' the reader to what has been going on. They are also a good refresher if there are long pauses between novels. J. K. Rowling reintroduces Harry every novel, as well as the events of the previous novels. Mary Pope Osborne, author of the popular children's series The Magic Treehouse, does the same thing, but in a prologue. Eoin Colfer, author of the Artemis Fowl series, has no recap at all (that I am aware of), and simply lets the reader discover the main character as the story progresses.
This question has two parts. The first is, if you are writing a series, should you include a recap with every novel after the first? Assuming you can write your novels in a realistic time frame, do you really need to summarize everything that has happened? Can't you outline a few of the major points and trust that the reader remembers the rest? Or is it best to err on the side of caution and assume the reader remembers nothing?
Also, is it really that likely that someone is going to pick up in what is obviously the middle of a series? If I find a series that sounds interesting, the first thing I do is look for book one. Is anyone really going to start in the middle? Am I the odd one out in starting at the beginning?
The second part of this question is, if you do include a recap, how should you do it? In what way should you include a recap? Should you integrate it into the story, as Rowling does? Or should you put it in a prologue which can be easily skipped if the reader is familiar with what has been happening?
I personally always find the recaps in Harry Potter boring, because I already know them. No matter how eloquently they are written, I almost always end up skipping over them to get back to the story. With a prologue, I can jump right into the action.
Should I include recaps with my series? If so, in what form?
1 answer
I can only speak to personal taste, but in the interest of generalization, I will try to justify my personal taste in this. I think serials should consist of stand alone novels that can be read independently. This is for four reasons.
Many of the serials I have read -- Sharpe, Aubrey/Maturin, Hornblower, Longmire, Leaphorn/Chee -- I first encountered at some middle book in the series, whatever the library or the airport bookstore happened to have on the shelf. If I had opened these to a recap, it would at once have suggested that there was no point in reading this if I could not start at the beginning, and that I was unlikely to enjoy this unless I bought the whole series, which is more of a commitment that I am willing to make. In other words, if you want me to start, you better promise me a payoff in this novel, even if I decide not to pursue the entire series.
I am not going to read an entire series in order from beginning to end without a break. I read the first six Aubrey/Maturin novels and then took a three year break before I picked up the seventh as a vacation read, which lead me to buy 7-11, after which I will almost certainly take another several year break before I pick up 12-21. Each novel needs to work as a novel. There are lots of ways to make the in in-situ recap interesting. O'Brien is a master of it, usually using it to introduce characters who will be important in the next novel.
A series of novels should be a series of novels -- independent works connected by a slender thread such as recurring characters. It is not the same thing as a saga -- a work too long to bind into a manageable book. LOTR is a saga, not a series. If you need an explicit recap to make sense of the book I am holding, that suggests that I am in the middle of a saga rather than a series. A saga cannot be read out of order or with large gaps of time. A series can. Each book in a series should work as the first book the reader reads.
Many stories have backstories that have to be told as some point. Just because the backstory of novel B happens to have been related in novel A does not make an initial infodump the right way to supply the backstory to the reader of novel B.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads