Post History
The whole book needs to be restructured. At least the way I write (more of a discovery writer), a new book would have to be written with the ending in mind. I would keep the old book for refer...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
by
System
·
2019-12-19T22:13:09Z (over 4 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/30285 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T07:01:21Z (over 4 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/30285 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
> The whole book needs to be restructured. At least the way I write (more of a discovery writer), a new book would have to be written with the ending in mind. I would keep the old book for reference (I presume I have infinite disk space and never throw anything away anyway); mostly for some hard-crafted descriptions, word choices and even dialogue. But I would start from the beginning. No matter how one writes, scenes grow from previous circumstances and should feel mostly inevitable. They shouldn't contain much of anything that doesn't contribute to the story. If I really could just go back and rewrite 25% of a story and get a completely different ending, that means 75% of what I wrote **had no impact on the story** , and to me that is unacceptable writing. Start over. The old book is a bin of parts you might be able to use or adapt. By starting over you don't have to re-use old characters and scenes, you can invent new ones purpose-fit. Brainstorm about the main characters, then the supporting roles. If you are compelled to change the ending, you must have realized something, at least subconsciously: Figure out what your story was **_really_** about, in more concrete terms, and start over.
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2017-09-19T16:51:51Z (over 6 years ago)
Original score: 1