Post History
I think a story needs to be consistent. Consider "The Sixth Sense" [*Spoiler Alert, I give away the Twist], the "I see dead people" movie with Bruce Willis. For myself, I made sure I saw it early...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/30388 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/30388 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
I think a story needs to be **_consistent_**. Consider "The Sixth Sense" [**\*Spoiler Alert, I give away the Twist**], the "I see dead people" movie with Bruce Willis. For myself, I made sure I saw it early, I knew from rumor there was a killer twist, and I did not want it spoiled. I was not disappointed: Bruce was dead the whole time! Holy crap! I watched it again immediately, the entire movie. It was expertly done, on second watch I did not see a thing **_inconsistent_** with the premise of how the dead were represented; Bruce was dead, did not know he was dead, his wife's harsh words and refusal to speak to him were all her speaking to the air in grief as if he were there to hear her: His spirit was, but he was not. And so on. There was definitely some odd behaviors going on, but we ignored them, and on second viewing later realized they made more sense than we thought. If your final revelation does not seem to follow with a **_2nd_** reading, then that needs improvement. You don't need explicit hints, like The Sixth Sense this can be atmosphere and feelings. The hints need to be there, the idea it will be a transformative revelation does not. What would help is a feeling that a transformative revelation **is needed** or desired, an air of frustration, boredom, unsettlement or loss. It is okay if the mundane task being performed turns out, for the character, to provide the metaphor they need to understand their larger personal problem and move beyond it. But we need to know they need or want a transformation, in the first Act, (roughly 1/2 a page or 2/3 for you, so no easy task). In The Sixth Sense, we see all of Bruce's problems in the first Act, his utter failure to help Vincent (who also saw dead people, and kills Bruce), his despondent wife, his inability and confusion with Haley Joel (the kid). We are misled into assuming these are normal life problems, but we aren't **_lied_** to. It makes the twist satisfying and entertaining to have missed the clues! If we were **_lied_** to, or the twist was **_completely hidden,_** then we would be miffed. The author didn't play a fair game; they cheated to pull a surprise. You don't have to start with "This is a story of Alice's unexpected transformation." You need to start with Alice being troubled, emotionally adrift, dissatisfied. In her thoughts, reflexively cynical and critical, barely able to resist being mean and hurtful. You need to show us that Alice _needs_ a transformation, a solution, a new way to understand the world that makes her (in the eyes of the reader) **better** than the unhappy bitch she has become.