Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A Indexing: after or during the writing process

I've done it both ways, and have found that a hybrid approach ends up working best. Doing it at the end means you can focus just on indexing (not writing). You're more likely to be consistent in ...

posted 7y ago by Monica Cellio‭  ·  last activity 5y ago by System‭

Answer
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T07:09:38Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/30838
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision by (deleted user) · 2019-12-08T07:09:38Z (almost 5 years ago)
I've done it both ways, and have found that a hybrid approach ends up working best.

Doing it at the end means you can focus _just_ on indexing (not writing). You're more likely to be consistent in choice of terms, avoiding unintended synonyms where some entries are under term A and some are under term B but they should be together. If you do your own indexing, though, then you're doing this with material you've already read several times, so (in my experience) you're more likely to miss things because you end up skimming even if you didn't mean to. If your team has other writers, you can mitigate this by doing each others' indexing.

Doing it as you go means you can note _at the time you introduce or heavily use a concept_ that it needs to go into the index. If you send out drafts for review before you're finished, you can get early feedback on these decisions and maybe even some crowd-sourced suggestions. You have less work to do at the end, when you might be feeling deadline pressure.

I've found that building up the beginnings of an index while writing increases the chances that important entries will happen, _but_ doing it as you go can lead to "drift" over time -- you started indexing all references to X but over time decided there were too many and you should prune, or you changed you mind about terminology, or you just weren't thinking about indexing last Tuesday and that chapter is sparse. If you index as you go then you should _also_ do a pass at the end to catch what you missed and clean up the problems you introduced along the way.

For me, the hybrid approach works better than either doing it all as I go or saving it all until the end. I once worked on a team where we had somebody with specialized background in indexing (I think a library-sciences degree?); we had that person do most of our indexing because of that, which pushed us to post-processing, but even so we found ourselves making notes like "this place is really important" along the way, as input to that process. `\index` sure seems like an easier way to provide that input than comments or external notes, doesn't it?

#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2017-10-16T15:32:00Z (about 7 years ago)
Original score: 1