Post History

Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/2032
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/2032
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

- **Finish them anyway.** You get good by writing; plotting alone isn't enough. And yeah, your first novel or two will probably be unpublishable. That's fine - those will be your practice novels. If you never write anything because they'll be less than perfect, I'm afraid you're likely not to write anything at all. Not only will finishing your imperfectly-plotted novels help hone a whole bunch of _other_ writing skills, it will give you hands-on experience with translating a plot into a story - which is crucial to understanding how to write a plot to begin with. It will give you the sense of where the originality and freshness might still come in even in a familiar plot, and of how to add extra layers without devolving into cliche. Practice, practice, practice.
- **Don't pander to the imagined masses.** It sounds like you're saying you've got Plot A that you yourself are perfectly happy with, but you've got the sense that Plot A "should" be more original/more meaningful. Don't bend yourself out of shape over what your novel "should" be like, particularly when you haven't written it yet. If you yourself feel that Plot A is terrific, then changing it in response to perceived criticism that you yourself don't understand and/or agree with is unlikely to be an improvement.
- **Most stories aren't very original.** They really aren't. This may not be particularly inspiring, but it's kind of comforting to know you don't _have_ to invent a new type of wheel. There's plenty of room for "familiar" stories with new characters, or new twists on old tropes, or just the joy of reading a story done well - even if it is similar to others we've read before.
- **Stories don't have to mean things.** They really don't. If you've got a cool idea, something that excites you and would be interesting to write about, then why twist it into a "message" or a "meaning"? You're not writing an editorial, you're writing a story. In other words, things happening. What's wrong with letting 'em happen?
- **Your writing is more original and meaningful than you think it is.** Although not necessarily in the ways you might expect. The unique thing about your writing is that its _yours_, and nobody else would write the same characters and events in quite the same way. You _can_ bring originality and meaning into your stories, even without intentionally doing something to be deliberately original or meaningful. By pouring your self, your thoughts, your feelings, your observations and understanding of the world, into your work - you'll be doing something unique. By improving your craft - your skill at portrayal, your eye for detail, your intriguing cast, your gripping scenes - you'll be polishing up that unique aspect until, eventually, it shines. Shakespeare wasn't original, but he was damned good at what he did.

I guess my advice here boils down to saying: it sounds like you're worrying about this more than is warranted. I understand your difficulty, because you _want_ your books to be original and meaningful - and isn't that why we read books to begin with? And it's true - your books _might_ be cliche or incoherent enough that they'll be awful. But it's important to understand that these two values are not the be-all and end-all of writing, and they certainly shouldn't _stop_ you from writing entirely. You've staked out where you want to get to - because you know you _can_ write stories that will have everything you want.

Keep going. You'll get there. :)

Original score: 17