Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

How do you get the legal disclaimer notice before you publish your fiction/non-fiction book?

+0
−0

Many of us have written/ are interested in writing a book. However, I've seen that all books, whether digital or printed, contain a legal disclaimer and some kind of copyright notice. Something like "trademark 2010" or "copyright 2010". Along with that there are bunches of paragraphs about it.

My question is, how do you create that legal disclaimer? Surely, the authors out there couldn't be copy-pasting it from each other's books.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/31259. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+1
−0

On the contrary, they do copy from each other, all the time. See this link On Contract Drafting and Plagiarism.

The key paragraph there is this, I have highlighted the most important sentence:

In mainstream drafting, copying-and-pasting from other contracts is certainly no sin. But that’s not because unauthorized copying is OK. Instead, it’s because everyone is copying from a common pool of contract verbiage that they tweak to suit their own purposes. It can’t be attributed to a single source, so there’s no one to provide consent for copying. And no one is in a position to claim that they’ve been harmed by the copying.

This means that if you see the same "legalese boilerplate" (identically worded phrases or sentences or even paragraphs) from multiple sources (like if two works are copyrighted by different entities), then the boilerplate is not copyrighted or copyrightable. Copyright must belong to one and only one entity.

So if I see something used by three or four authors or owners, I presume it is safe to copy verbatim.

I would warn you should USE IT verbatim, legal language can be grammatically awkward and feel like they beg to be corrected by writers, but might mean something subtly different in court, if they were. Sometimes the language being used is taken verbatim from an actual law or a formal legal opinion from some case, and should not be altered.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »