Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

50%
+0 −0
Q&A Scientific article: How to say that with our result something could be done but hasn't

I don't have citations, but I've seen a couple approaches to this problem: "One possible application of (this work) would be to..." -- by casting it speculatively like that, using "would be", you...

posted 7y ago by Monica Cellio‭  ·  last activity 5y ago by System‭

Answer
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T07:18:07Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/31291
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision by (deleted user) · 2019-12-08T07:18:07Z (almost 5 years ago)
I don't have citations, but I've seen a couple approaches to this problem:

- "One possible application of (this work) would be to..." -- by casting it speculatively like that, using "would be", you're saying "this is an idea, not something we've demonstrated".

- "A possible application of (this work) not found in our review of the literature is..." -- here you're offering the idea and saying you did some legwork and didn't find anybody who pursued it.

Unless you're writing this in the abstract, you probably don't need to say explicitly that you're not following up on the idea in this paper -- readers can see that easily enough. If you _are_ using this in the abstract (or early in a longer work), you can signal that you're not going to talk about it here by using the word "future": "An area for future work would be to apply (this work) to (this new idea)". "Future work" is code for "not addressed in the present work".

#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2017-11-07T04:11:31Z (about 7 years ago)
Original score: 3