Post History

Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/32233
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

This may not answer your question, but it is something I have done.

Pros I found:

- You manage smaller files and are not dealing with the entire story. It is easier to find your place and manage when editing.
- If the file gets corrupted or something happens, it will only affect that chapter and not the whole thing.

(The 2nd one was what drove me into trying this method, back in the days there were those 3" floppy disks and one of them corrupted my word document and left computer code and formatting inconsistencies scattered throughout the whole thing.)

The cons I ran into:

- Because you're only looking at a single chapter, you may be tempted to write each as if they are their own separate story or run into continuity problems if you're not looking at the whole thing as a single unit.

(this came to be a huge con for me when reviewing, reading over the whole thing.) Instead of reading what would be a novel I was reading what turned into a series of short stories.

- At least for me it got to be very long (again dealing with short stories of varying length) and I had like 20+ "chapter" files with no idea how long the total piece is or how to fit it in a cohesive unit. Some chapters I seldom bothered to look at so ended up weaker. (the intros and dreaded "chapter 1's"

(still trying to sort that through and wondering how to change what ended up a series of short stories into an actual novel.)

* * *

That said I am rewriting a draft and seeing how having the whole thing in one file goes and if that helps me deal with the cons I ran into.

Original score: 5