Post History
By definition TL;DR, short for "too long; didn't read", is Internet slang to say that some text being replied to has been ignored because of its length. In slang it can also stand for "Too lazy...
#3: Attribution notice added
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/32819 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
By definition > TL;DR, short for "too long; didn't read", is Internet slang to say that some text being replied to has been ignored because of its length. In slang it can also stand for "Too lazy; didn't read". It is also used as a signifier for a summary of an online post or news article. > [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TL;DR) Usually the author of a long post gives a tl;dr, a summary of the what the post about in a short paragraph or sentence. This can be put before the post begins, or the after. > **tl;dr** We are asking you to start saving water and electricity for the sake of our environment. > > Blahblahblah... I've seen two types of people, who scrolls **down** to see the tl;dr, and those who looks for the summary on the **top** of the post. This makes me unsure where to put my post summary. If I were to write a post, a letter, etc. how can I decide which position is the most beneficial to me, i.e avoid people skipping my question entirely and getting the message across. **tl;dr** How can I decide that putting my tl;dr at the top of the post, or bottom, will benefits me the most? What factors should I consider? I'm thinking more about the types of the post: informational post might be better with bottom summary, while question better with top summary. What other factors affecting this? **Note:** Some put a notification at top of the post, informing a tl;dr is available at the bottom of the post.