Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Should the documentation of a known issue change dependent on the stability of a product release?

+1
−0

I am writing the release documentation for a software product and a design flaw has been discovered after the code has been frozen. Does the documentation describing this issue change if the product is a beta release to selected customers only? What if the product is a 1.0 to be exposed to a public audience? What if no software patch is currently scheduled?

Related to How should I document a product release with an inherently flawed design?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/33262. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

Beta or not does not matter, whether a patch exists does not matter, write it up. Document it.

Like your previous question, this is a business matter, not a documentation issue you should decide for yourself. You should document it, even if you have just ONE beta tester, whether or not a patch exists, and let your management decide if they are willing to risk any liability or negative publicity that may arise from a failure to document the behavior.

This should not be your decision, it should be the decision of somebody with fiscal responsibility for the fate of your company or employer.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »