Post History
As part of some research I am doing on measuring documentation quality, I have come across the terms "accurate" and "believable" as two separate dimensions of information quality. But the differen...
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T08:01:22Z (about 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/33451 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
by
Yoel
·
2019-12-08T08:01:22Z (about 5 years ago)
As part of some research I am doing on measuring documentation quality, I have come across the terms "accurate" and "believable" as two **separate** dimensions of information quality. But the differences between them are not clear at all to me: they define **accurate** as "correct, reliable, and certified free of error" and **believable** as "true, real, and credible". Looking at the dictionary didn't help me much either. So I'm putting this out here - what is the difference between these two dimension as they relate to documentation quality? The original source is here: Wang R. & Strong, D. (1996). Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J. of Man. Info. Sys., 12 (4), p.5-34)
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2018-02-11T16:50:00Z (almost 7 years ago)
Original score: 7