Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A Limitations of automatic documentation

Automated systems such as Sandcastle and Swagger are good at converting code syntax into documentation. Those will produce marginal documentation. What they don't do is add insight into the calls. ...

posted 7y ago by ForEachLoop‭  ·  last activity 5y ago by System‭

Answer
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T08:04:23Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/33574
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision by user avatar ForEachLoop‭ · 2019-12-08T08:04:23Z (almost 5 years ago)
Automated systems such as Sandcastle and Swagger are good at converting code syntax into documentation. Those will produce marginal documentation. What they don't do is add insight into the calls. Rarely does a method exist by itself. There are always additional notes needed, caveats explained, side affects, clarifications for each the parameters, return values, the method itself, and even using the method in a larger context. Compare, for example a typical MSDN reference page with a anyone REST reference page. For each method the MSDN page is longer and more detailed, the material developers want. The REST ones are usually scarce with fewer additionally notes.

Then there are examples and code snippets. No auto generated application can make those. A lot of people don't understand API documentation. 95% of the time, developers just want a sample to copy and paste. Automated documentation rarely generates those.

Many think that being able to use a reference page is enough. It's not. It's the ease and completeness in how the questions are answered that counts. This is the difference between adequate documentation and great documentation.

#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2018-01-24T16:20:34Z (almost 7 years ago)
Original score: 5