Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

50%
+0 −0
Q&A Words we may believe are neutral yet have restricted connotations

I'm not sure that the issue with enormity is that it has emotional baggage. The issue is that it has restricted usage -- it is only use in certain constructions such as "enormity of the crime". Thi...

posted 7y ago by Mark Baker‭  ·  last activity 5y ago by System‭

Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed by user avatar System‭ · 2020-01-03T20:41:57Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/33662
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T08:06:47Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/33662
License name: CC BY-SA 3.0
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision by user avatar System‭ · 2019-12-08T08:06:47Z (almost 5 years ago)
I'm not sure that the issue with enormity is that it has emotional baggage. The issue is that it has restricted usage -- it is only use in certain constructions such as "enormity of the crime". This is not a matter of emotional baggage so much as simply an accident of the development of standard usage.

Other words with similarly restricted usage include: nether, bated, riddance, and petard. There is a list of some such words in the Wikipedia entry on Fossil words: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil\_word](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil_word). These fossil words are perhaps a more restricted case than "enormity" since most of them occur only in a single idiom. But I think the same general idea applies: they are words that continue to be used only in restricted cases and limited constructions.

As for emotional baggage, many words can have emotional baggage, but mostly it depends on the context in which they are used. There are, of course, some trigger words that set off an instant response no matter how they are used. Some of these are durable. Some lose their trigger status after the events they are associated with fade from consciousness. If you Google for "trigger words" you will find lots of lists, though they seem to focus on the ones to use rather than the ones to avoid.

In any case, while individual words can have emotional overtones, to really evoke emotions you need to tell a story. This can be a very brief story, using only a few words, but it is stories, not words, that pack real emotional punch. Indeed, to the extent that words have emotional overtones it is because they trigger a memory of stories.

The other thing about using a story to evoke emotion rather than a word is that a story is a much more accurate instrument for the job. The emotional overtones of words can be all over the map, because they can suggest different stories to different people. By telling a story, you control which story the reader receives and therefore control the emotional response much more.

#1: Imported from external source by user avatar System‭ · 2018-02-21T06:08:54Z (almost 7 years ago)
Original score: 7