Post History
Super intelligent doesn't necessarily mean "not feeling human" to write. They are two related questions. I'd say that any reasonable definition of "super intelligent" for an A.I. would include the...
Answer
#3: Attribution notice added
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/34798 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
Super intelligent doesn't necessarily mean "not feeling human" to write. They are two related questions. I'd say that any reasonable definition of "super intelligent" for an A.I. would include the ability to seem to sound human when that serves the AI's goal (whatever that is). Writing super-intelligence is easy, as the AI basically has access to the _author's_ knowledge. The more interesting question is, what does the AI want? That will tell you how the AI will choose to deploy author-level predicative knowledge about its world. Making it sound non-human shouldn't be strictly _because_ it is super intelligent, but rather because it is not human, regardless of intelligence level. As an other answer points out, the Replicants' lack of empathy was a defining characteristic. To make a character sound non-human, take away something essentially human, or add some way of seeing the world in which humans don't. For example: Data, as a character, sounds non-human because he doesn't get humor (amongst other things). Lore sounded much more human because he did. They were both super intelligent, but that wasn't the source of their differing "voices." **Use the super-intelligence as a tool in service of that "otherness" rather than the cause.**