Post History
It's been mentioned on this board before, but rules which arbitrarily declare any part of a language off-limits are ridiculous. They may be meant to give guardrails to new writers, but all they end...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/35156 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/35156 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
It's been mentioned on this board before, but rules which arbitrarily declare any part of a language off-limits are ridiculous. They may be meant to give guardrails to new writers, but all they end up doing is making people frantic that they are Breaking A Rule. So ignore that idea. * * * In this instance, past tense vs. past participle indicates actions that took place in the past, but one is the "present" of the novel and the other is a completed action farther back in the past. To elucidate: > She closed the book. Her father had given it to her as a gift three months ago. When she had first read it, it had given her goosebumps. _She closed the book_ is in the present of the story, even if it's being told in past tense. It's what she just did right now. Three months ago, her father gave her a book. Three months ago (or less), she read the book, and she got goosebumps. Those actions took place in the _distant_ past, and they were completed. To separate them from the "present-past" of the story's actions, you use the past participle. Your other example is a little trickier. Let's break it up: > She closed the book. Present of the story. > Her father gave it to her as a gift three months ago. This tense doesn't work. _Gave_ in this specific sentence is the present of the story. You need to use _had given._ > When she first read it, it gave her goosebumps. This can be parsed as "a continuing action in the past," as opposed to "a completed action in the past." _It had given her goosebumps_ means it happened and it's done. Because you're using _When_ here, it indicates that the actions happened farther back in the past, so you can get away with the "present-past" of _she first read it, it gave her goosebumps._ She's kind of remembering being back at that moment and reliving it. Try setting your sentences in the present tense as an experiment and see if that makes it clearer: > She turns the final page with a sigh, closes the book, and hugs it to her chest. Her father had given it to her as a gift three months ago. When she had first read it, it had given her goosebumps. versus: > She turns the final page with a sigh, closes the book, and hugs it to her chest. Her father gave it to her as a gift three months ago. When she first read it, it gave her goosebumps. No matter what, _Her father gave_ simply doesn't ring right. It has to be _Her father had given._