Post History
Depends on what your "limit" is. If you are limiting yourself to one character, then yes: the Harry Potter series is told in third person limited omniscient, and we get Harry's thoughts, but no o...
Answer
#4: Attribution notice removed
by
System
·
2019-12-13T11:59:57Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/2391 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#3: Attribution notice added
by
System
·
2019-12-08T01:29:39Z (almost 5 years ago)
Source: https://writers.stackexchange.com/a/2391 License name: CC BY-SA 3.0 License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
#2: Initial revision
Depends on what your "limit" is. If you are limiting yourself to one character, then yes: the Harry Potter series is told in third person limited omniscient, and we get Harry's thoughts, but no one else's (other than two or three specific chapters in the entire series). But if something doesn't happen to Harry, or if he doesn't see it or hear about it, then the reader can't know it. If by "limited" you mean that you are telling the story as though you are describing a movie, so the reader can see actions going on at any place or time and focused on any character, but can only observe the action through the five senses, then no: you aren't giving _anyone's_ POV. Pick one and stick with it.
#1: Imported from external source
by
System
·
2011-04-04T12:28:45Z (over 13 years ago)
Original score: 9