Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

75%
+4 −0
Q&A What is the possessive form of et al.?

When referring to a paper with multiple authors by using the name of the first author and "et al.", how does one indicate possession? For example, is it correct to write, "Einstein et al.'s paper ...

3 answers  ·  posted 3y ago by BR11‭  ·  last activity 2mo ago by ArtOfCode‭

Question grammar
#1: Initial revision by user avatar BR11‭ · 2021-03-18T21:12:47Z (about 3 years ago)
What is the possessive form of et al.?
When referring to a paper with multiple authors by using the name of the first author and "et al.", how does one indicate possession?

For example, is it correct to write, "Einstein et al.'s paper stated the opposite conclusion."

Some have suggested that rephrasing is the best option, but let's assume that is not an option (for whatever reason).

Another suggestion is to drop the Latin "et al." and use the English "and colleagues". However, again, I am interested in knowing how to use "et al." specifically.

Another suggestion put the 's with Einstein: Einstein's et al. paper. However, this seems incorrect to me.