Post History
Just use the other possessive form: The paper of Einstein et al. stated the opposite conclusion. Although it would read better if you replaced “of” with “by”, but then it would no longer be a...
Answer
#2: Post edited
by
celtschk
·
2021-03-19T07:43:15Z (almost 4 years ago)
- Just use the other possessive form:
> The paper of Einstein et al. proved the opposite.- Although it would read better if you replaced “of” with “by”, but then it would no longer be a possessive case, and thus violate your (rather strange) restriction.
- Just use the other possessive form:
- > The paper of Einstein et al. stated the opposite conclusion.
- Although it would read better if you replaced “of” with “by”, but then it would no longer be a possessive case, and thus violate your (rather strange) restriction.
#1: Initial revision
by
celtschk
·
2021-03-19T07:42:14Z (almost 4 years ago)
Just use the other possessive form: > The paper of Einstein et al. proved the opposite. Although it would read better if you replaced “of” with “by”, but then it would no longer be a possessive case, and thus violate your (rather strange) restriction.