Growing Up Oblivious and Magic [closed]
Closed by System on May 25, 2018 at 15:17
This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.
I don't think that I've ever read a book about a character was sat down and explained to them that they are magic, supernatural, etc. Every time I've read a book, they only discover they are magic, supernatural, etc. by "a certain age." This is due to the guardian, either knowledgable or caring, is absent. So what would be some (non-meta) excuses in a guardian not informing their ward about their nature.
This post was sourced from https://writers.stackexchange.com/q/36300. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
1 answer
+1 to DPT and EBH, this is the only point I can think of to add to theirs. As the OP's link alludes, Magic appearing is typically (not always) a metaphor for puberty and the appearance of sexual desire, a mysterious life change for nearly all of us (even if we were warned).
Considering sexual desire, there are two social ways of dealing with it; one is to deal with it openly (by parents or school), with sex education and a more explicit detailing of the problems and dangers, ways to prevent them.
The other is more closed, to not detail anything at all, demand abstinence, deny the feelings are "real" (e.g. diminish them as puppy love, infatuation, hormonal imbalances), treat them as an "illness" or inflicted evil (e.g. supernatural temptation) that must be cured, and employ various kinds of threats to enforce chastity and abstinence (religious and secular threats) until sexual engagement is socially approved (eg marriage).
But then consider homosexual desire: Rather few will have it (perhaps 15% of persons), and IRL a smaller percent of self-identified homosexuals have expressed they felt lifelong and pre-pubescent homosexuality.
Without certainty on whether or not a child is homosexual, do we educate them on how homosexuals have sex and how to do that safely, or do we wait until we have certainty?
That might be the better metaphor for Magic: If only a small percentage of children exhibit ability before puberty, then perhaps guardians leave an uncomfortable (to them) conversation for if and when it becomes necessary.
This could be due to their own discomfort in talking about it (and lack of answers), or due to the culture in general having a magic-phobia, a dislike of magical people, or even laws against the use of magic (e.g. as in the TV Series Merlin).
If the culture prefers its magicians "in the closet" or actively prohibits and persecutes magicians (or even treats them as criminals to be jailed or put to death), guardians would likely not mention to their ward any possibility of the ward being magic. If the guardian also shares that phobia, they might even be disappointed (or horrified) to learn their child is magic, and try to deny it or force them to suppress their magical ability.
Presuming pubescent children are not entirely stupid, in that situation the child might also hide their ability, and develop a feel of magic to help them seek out the small percentage of other children that have it, until they find the wider underground community of magicians.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads